At 8:06 PM 10/7/95, Goethe wrote:
quoted 7 lines But then there's a lot to be said for music that isn't technically
>> > But then there's a lot to be said for music that isn't technically
>> > perfect in terms of compositional style, rhythm programming, or
>> > whatever.
>> oh i certainly have a LOT to say about that sort of music... how about "it
>> sucks" for starters.
>I guess live TG sucks then. Well, you may think so, but they are
>considered by many to be innovators in electronic improvisation.
are we talking live music or recorded music? i hold live stuff to an
entirely different standard. i thought we were talking about recorded
music that "isn't technically perfect in terms of" blah blah blah.
quoted 2 lines 95% of Fax sucks too then (I know some would agree this statement...I
>95% of Fax sucks too then (I know some would agree this statement...I
>don't!)
me neither! 99.9% of Fax sucks!
quoted 3 lines there is little music being made these days that is compositionally perfect.
>there is little music being made these days that is compositionally perfect.
>I like a well constructed rhythm track as much as anyone but there's more
>to music than perfect programming.
you're being misled by the word "perfect". we were talking about being
able to enjoy music that may be deficient in one area but strong in
another. my ability to enjoy music like that is severely lacking. it's
gotta be a strong all around package (and this includes production quality)
or i get turned off real fast.
pardon me if i seem exceptionally grouchy today but the Blue Angels have
been buzzing my neighborhood for a few hours now and i've got a splitting
headache. :)
--
Name: Jon
Email: jsd@cyborganic.com
Web:
http://www.cyborganic.com/People/jsd